Effect of Design Parameter Variation on Flat Plate Solar Collector Efficiency Using Nano Working Fluids
Abstract
Flat plate solar collectors have relatively low efficiencies compared to other types of collectors. Water, which is the most commonly used working fluid limits the efficiency of flat plate solar collectors due to its poor heat transfer properties. Also, proper sizing of collector design parameters is a major factor for enhanced efficiency. In this study, the efficiency of a flat plate solar collector was simulated using water and three different nano working fluids: graphene, aluminium oxide and copper oxide nano fluids. Three different mass fractions of nano particles: 0.025, 0.05 and 0.075 weight percent (wt. %) were used for each of the nano fluids. Collector performance equations were programmed and simulated in MATLAB, using collector area of 1.2 m2, average solar radiation of 750 W/m2 and inlet working fluid temperature of 40oC. The collector design parameters: tube spacing, fluid mass flow rate, and tube diameter were varied and the effect on efficiency determined. The values of these parameters which gave maximum efficiencies for each of the working fluids were obtained. Maximum collector efficiencies attained were 0.78, 0.7 and 0.68 for graphene, aluminium oxide and copper oxide nano fluids respectively, at mass fraction of 0.075 wt. %, 0.1 kg/s mass flow rate, 0.1 m tube diameter and tube spacing between 0.1 to 0.12 m. At zero loss efficiency point and mass fraction 0.075 wt. %, increase in collector efficiency attained by the nano fluids over water as working fluid were 28%, 22.8% and 19.2% for graphene, aluminium oxide and copper oxide nano fluids respectively.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
G. V. Kumar, K. Sridhar and S. A. Kumar. “Heat removal factor of an integrated solar flat plate collector with packed bed system”. International journal of engineering technology, management and applied sciences. 5 (7), 720 – 727, 2017.
N. K. C. Sint, I. A. Choudhury, H. H. Masjuki and H. Aoyama. “Theoritical analysis to determine the efficiency of a CuO – water nanofluid based flat plate solar collector for domestic water heating system in Myanmar.” Solar energy, 155, 608 – 619, 2017.
M. K. Bhatt, S. N. Gaderia and S. A. Channiwala. “Experimental investigations on top loss coefficients of solar flat plate collector at different tilt angle.” Journal of world academy of science engineering and technology. 79, 432 – 436, 2011.
P. V. Ranjith. and A. K. Aftab . “A comparative study on the experimental and computational analysis of solar flat plate collector using an alternative working fluid.” Procedia technology, 24, 546 – 553, 2016.
J. K. Wisam, G. Habib, T. J. Hassan and R. A. Hadi . “Enhanced heat transfer performance of a flat plate solar collector using CuO/ water and TiO/ water nanofluids.” International journal of applied engineering research. 13 (6), 3673 – 3682, 2018.
E. Arikan, S. Abbasoglu and M. Gazi. “Experimental performance analysis of flat plate solar collectors using different nanofluids.” Sustainability, 10, 1 – 11, 2018.
N. Akram, R. Sadri, S. N. Kazi, S. M. Ahmed, M. N. Zubir and M. Ridha. “An experimental investigation on the performance of a flat plate solar collector using eco – friendly treated graphene nanoplatetets – water nanofluids.” Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 138 (1), 609 – 621, 2019.
Y. Lee, J. Hyomin, P. Ji – tae, D. Antonio and K. Sedong. “Experimental investigation on evaluation of thermal performance of solar heating systems using Al2O3 nanofluid.” Applied sciences. 1 – 9, 2020.
O. A. Alawi, et al., “Experimental and theoretical analysis of energy efficiency in flat plate solar collector using monolayer graphene nanofluids.” Sustainability, 1 – 22, 2021.
M. T. Jamal – Abad, A. Zamzamian, E. Imani and M. Mansouri. “Experimental study of the performance of a flat plate solar collector using Cu – water nanofluid.” Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer, 27(4): 756 – 760, 2013.
L. H. Kumar et al. “Energy, exergy and economic analysis of liquid flat plate solar collector using green covalent functionalized graphene nanoplatelets.” Applied thermal engineering, 192, 1 – 19. 2021.
A. Ahmadi, D. D. Ganji and F. Jafarkazemi. “Analysis of utilizing graphene nanoplatelets to enhance thermal performance of flat plate solar collectors.” Energy conversion and management, 126: 1 – 11, 2016.
K. El – Said, et al. “Thermo physical properties of graphene based nano fluids.” International journal of thermo fluids10: 1 – 12, 2021.
T. Tun – Ping, and H. Yi – Hsuan. “Estimation and experimental study of the density and specific heat for alumina nanofluid.” Journal of experimental nanoscience. 9(7), 1 – 13, 2014.
R. Mondragon, et al. “Flat plate solar collector performance using alumina nanofluids: Experimental characterization and efficiency tests.” PLoS ONE 14(2): e0212260. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0212260, 2019.
T. Kitano, T. Kataoka and T. Shirota. “An empirical equation of relative viscosity of polymer melts filled with various inorganic fillers.” Rheologica Act. 20(2): 207 – 209, 1981.
J. A. Duffie and W. A. Beckman. Solar engineering of thermal processes. 4th Edition John Wiley and Sons Inc., 111 River Street Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S.A. 2013. pp. 236 – 667.
L. B. Theodore S. L. Adrienne P. I. Frank and P. D. David. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 7th edition, John Wiley and sons. Ltd. 2011.
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v12i2.12858.g8460
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Online ISSN: 1309-0127
Publisher: Gazi University
IJRER is cited in SCOPUS, EBSCO, WEB of SCIENCE (Clarivate Analytics);
IJRER has been cited in Emerging Sources Citation Index from 2016 in web of science.
WEB of SCIENCE in 2025;
h=35,
Average citation per item=6.59
Last three Years Impact Factor=(1947+1753+1586)/(146+201+78)=5286/425=12.43
Category Quartile:Q4